Practice 03 · of eight

Insurance & claims investigations

Objective field and intelligence support for complex, inconsistent, high-value or suspicious claims — without prejudging the claimant, and reported in both directions.

Questions this practice answers

Clients rarely arrive with a service in mind.

  1. Is the loss consistent with the account given?
  2. Are there undisclosed prior or parallel claims?
  3. Does the evidence support repudiation — or payment?
  4. Can the scene and timeline be independently verified?

What the work involves

Within the ten-stage process.

Fig. 01 · This practice, staged
  1. Stages 01–03

    Appointment and legality

    Panel or per-claim appointment, with the lawful basis for verification recorded.

  2. Stage 05

    Verification

    Scene and field enquiries, record checks and preserved public digital material.

  3. Stage 06

    Grading

    Each element of the claim is graded; consistency is reported as readily as inconsistency.

  4. Stage 07

    Reporting

    A claims report written to be read by the ombud or a court, not only by the assessor.

Deliverable

What you receive.

A claims report stating what the evidence supports, what it contradicts and what remains inconclusive — with the claimant's position fairly recorded.

Annexures
  • Claims reportPrimary
  • Observation logAnnexure
  • Photographic recordWhere lawful
Methods used
  • Field verification
  • Scene enquiries
  • Statement analysis
  • Record checks
  • OSINT

Limits of this practice

What this work is not.

  • No prejudgement of the claimant
  • No medical records without lawful basis
  • No open-ended surveillance
  • No claims decision made on the insurer's behalf

Often combined with

Most matters draw on three or four practices.

Confidential enquiries

Start with the question, not the method.

We assess the concern, lawful purpose and available information before recommending a scope.

Request a confidential consultation